Iterated Revision in the Spirit of Update: A Lazy Update
نویسنده
چکیده
Since they were introduced, AGM revision and Katsuno and Mendelzon's update have been considered orthogonal theory change operations serving diierent purposes. This work provides a new presentation of AGM revision based on the update semantic apparatus establishing in such a way a bridge between the two seemingly incomparable frameworks. We deene a new operation as a variant of the standard update that we call lazy update. We prove the correspondence between lazy updates and (transitively relational, well behaved) AGM revisions when a given xed theory is considered (Theorem 3.11). Furthermore, given that lazy update allows iteration, we can characterize lazy update functions as those AGM revisions satisfying (K*1)-(K*8) plus two new postulates (LU-9) and (LU-8) governing the revision of diierent theories (Theorem 4.3). We believe these results bring new light to the issue of how revision and update functions are related. They also provide a novel way to achieve iterated theory revision. 1 Overview Since they were introduced, the AGM notion of revision 1] and Katsuno and Mendelzon's update 5] have been considered two fundamentally diierent ways of changing knowledge. The usual interpretation is as follows Revision takes place when new information is regarded as correcting our theory of a static world. According to revision, as little as possible of the original theory should be changed in order to accommodate the new information. It is in this sense that revision involves minimal change. Update, in contrast, takes place when our knowledge is modiied in response to changes into an evolving world. When new information is confronted, each complete consistent extension of our theory about the world should be considered. From the perspective of each of these extensions, the most similar complete theory accounting for the new information should be chosen. The result of the update is what the new theories have in common. It is in this sense that update involves maximal similarity.
منابع مشابه
A conceptual framework for (iterated) revision, update, and nonmonotonic reasoning
This paper makes a foundational contribution to the discussions on the very nature of belief change operations. Belief revision and belief update are investigated within an abstract framework of epistemic states and (qualitative or quantitative) conditionals. Moreover, we distinguish between background knowledge and contextual information in order to analyse belief change more appropriately. Th...
متن کاملIterated Belief Change: A Transition System Approach
We use a transition system approach to reason about the evolution of an agent’s beliefs as actions are executed. Some actions cause an agent to perform belief revision and some actions cause an agent to perform belief update, but the interaction between revision and update can be nonelementary. We present a set of basic postulates describing the interaction of revision and update, and we introd...
متن کاملLinking Iterated Belief Change Operations to Nonmonotonic Reasoning
The study of the exact relationships between belief revision and belief update, on one side, and belief revision and nonmonotonic reasoning, on the other, has raised considerable interest, but still, the picture is far from being complete. In this paper, we add some new details to this line of research by making a foundational contribution to the discussions on the very nature of belief change ...
متن کاملA Unified Model of Qualitative Belief Change: A Dynamical Systems Perspective
Belief revision and belief update have been proposed as two types of belief change serving different purposes, revision intended to capture changes in belief state reflecting new information about a static world, and update intended to capture changes of belief in response to a changing world. We argue that routine belief change involves elements of both and present a model of generalized updat...
متن کاملIterated Belief Change Due to Actions and Observations
In action domains where agents may have erroneous beliefs, reasoning about the effects of actions involves reasoning about belief change. In this paper, we use a transition system approach to reason about the evolution of an agent’s beliefs as actions are executed. Some actions cause an agent to perform belief revision while others cause an agent to perform belief update, but the interaction be...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 1999